From: | Anand Kumria <wildfire(at)progsoc(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Date: | 2004-11-08 17:18:56 |
Message-ID: | pan.2004.11.08.17.18.56.742108@progsoc.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:53:13 +0100, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Andrew McMillan wrote:
>> Switching to Arch is more work, but it also offers a lot more benefits -
>> including the opportunity for individuals to maintain their own trees,
>> and be able to work out which patchsets from someone else's tree have
>> not been applied. If anything is going to become the open-source
>> BitKeeper it will be this, I think.
>>
> For those interested in SVN versus arch, I found the following from Tom
> Lord (the guy behind Arch)
>
> http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/diagnosing
>
> and a reply from Greg Hudson (SVN developer)
>
> http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/undiagnosing.
>
There is a fairly detailed comparison in the GNU Arch wiki as well.
<URL: http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/SubVersionAndCvsComparison>
Note: if you're a postgres committer you may have more luck seeking out
your nearest SCM advocate -- almost all of them would regard Postgres
migrating to their preferred SCM as a 'win' -- let them work for you by
walking you through things.
Cheers,
Anand
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Reini Urban | 2004-11-08 17:44:12 | Re: latest cygwin build failure |
Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2004-11-08 17:03:52 | View pg_stat_activity slow to get up to date |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-11-08 17:45:29 | fix compile warning for pg_backup_tar.c |
Previous Message | John Gray | 2004-11-08 14:54:03 | Re: contrib/xml2: add function xml_encode_special_chars |