From: | "Mark Felder" <feld(at)feld(dot)me> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Date: | 2010-12-06 21:28:26 |
Message-ID: | op.vna9xoat34t2sn@tech304 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:09:04 -0600, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> though I think it is possible to do
> in Oracle.
I'm not a DBA but the DBA I closely worked with at my last job had me do
maintenance on a VPN that went to another company -- basically we had
synonyms on both ends that let our databases be interconnected. They paid
to have access to our data via this VPN and the synonyms. I'm pretty sure
I remember things changing a few times and if the synonyms weren't
matching on both ends stuff would break. So yeah, I'm 99% this is possible
in Oracle and I don't know how anyone would replicate that type of an
environment in Postgres.
Regards,
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael C Rosenstein | 2010-12-06 21:30:22 | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Previous Message | Michael C Rosenstein | 2010-12-06 21:27:05 | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |