Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment

From: James Cloos <cloos(at)jhcloos(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment
Date: 2012-06-17 23:50:07
Message-ID: m3k3z533co.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "PE" == Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:

PE> That depends on how you built it. Just being a beta by itself doesn't
PE> turn on any extra debugging.

OK. So either I misremembered or it was something no longer done.

PE> That depends on how you built it.

Its a Gentoo box; both were build from their ebuilds, with the same gcc,
flags, etc.

PE> Compare the output of pg_config --configure from both installations.

The only differences are 9.1 vs 9.2 in the paths.

Thanks,

-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos(at)jhcloos(dot)com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2012-06-18 00:43:26 Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
Previous Message James Cloos 2012-06-17 23:44:21 Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment