Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Date: 2011-02-11 19:16:52
Message-ID: m2zkq28jq3.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm not very happy with that at all, either as to the concept or the
>> specific version-alias names.  I don't think that CREATE and ALTER
>> really need different default version targets.  And those choices of
>> names carry far too much baggage.  "Default" is what they are as far as
>> the system is concerned, but names like those imply a lot more.
>>
>> Anybody else have an opinion on this detail?
>
> I agree with you.

Ok, I'm in the minority here. That happened before :)

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2011-02-11 19:17:47 Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-11 19:16:20 Re: Range Types: empty ranges