Re: sql_drop Event Trigger

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sql_drop Event Trigger
Date: 2013-02-06 16:33:43
Message-ID: m2y5f1ieqg.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Well, a list of object OIDs is of exactly zero use once the command
> has been carried out. So I don't think that that represents a useful
> or even very testable feature on its own, if there's no provision to
> fire user code while the OIDs are still in the catalogs.

For the same reason I want to talk about which information we publish. I
can see why having access to the catalogs is a more general answer here
though.

Now, I've just been asked to remove "sql_drop" and I don't want to be
adding it again before I know that whoever will commit the patch agrees
with an explicit return of that feature from the dead. Please…

--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phil Sorber 2013-02-06 16:33:56 Re: get_progname() should not be const char *?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-02-06 16:30:38 Re: sql_drop Event Trigger