Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
Date: 2010-11-26 18:59:36
Message-ID: m2tyj3oqqv.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Without some "restoreddl" which able to "compile" the set of
> database objects from many files this tool (getddl) does nothing
> because another developer can change the database directly

Indeed, getddl does not try to solve that issue. It's more a VCS and
editor friendly export, to be able to see diffs that come from the real
current database state rather than what your code tracking makes you
think is in production already.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-11-26 19:06:18 Re: Assertion failure on hot standby
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-11-26 18:27:22 Re: duplicate connection failure messages