Re: Sync Rep v17

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v17
Date: 2011-03-02 15:58:02
Message-ID: m2tyfl346t.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> To achieve the effect Fujii is looking for, we would have to silently drop
> the connection. That would correctly leave the client not knowing whether
> the transaction committed or not.

+1

>> It might be reasonable to COMMIT but also issue a warning message, or
>> to just close the connection without telling the client what happened,
>> but sending an error seems poor.
>
> Yeah, I guess that would work too, if the client knows to watch out for
> those warnings.

-1

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-03-02 16:19:56 Re: Sync Rep v17
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2011-03-02 15:43:31 Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)