From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Sync Rep v17 |
Date: | 2011-03-02 15:58:02 |
Message-ID: | m2tyfl346t.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> To achieve the effect Fujii is looking for, we would have to silently drop
> the connection. That would correctly leave the client not knowing whether
> the transaction committed or not.
+1
>> It might be reasonable to COMMIT but also issue a warning message, or
>> to just close the connection without telling the client what happened,
>> but sending an error seems poor.
>
> Yeah, I guess that would work too, if the client knows to watch out for
> those warnings.
-1
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-03-02 16:19:56 | Re: Sync Rep v17 |
Previous Message | Jan Urbański | 2011-03-02 15:43:31 | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) |