| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2011-02-10 16:58:56 |
| Message-ID: | m2oc6jltbj.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> That would be rejected because you're not allowed to drop an individual
> member object of an extension. (And no, I don't want to have a kluge in
> dependency.c that makes that test work differently when
> creating_extension.)
Fair enough, all the more as soon as we have ALTER EXTENSION DROP :)
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-10 17:01:42 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-02-10 16:45:20 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |