| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?) |
| Date: | 2013-06-27 11:34:44 |
| Message-ID: | m2obaryegb.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > - a template that is created in another template script does not appear
>> to
>> > depend on the parent template.
>>
>> I don't think that should be automatically the case, even if I admit I
>> didn't think about that case.
>>
> Really? My understanding is everything that is created under extension
> depends on the extension, which depends on the template. Why only template
> is exception?
Oh sorry, I understood you meant at CREATE TEMPLATE FOR EXTENSION time
rather than at CREATE EXTENSION time, and that you were refering to
dependency as in the "require" control parameter.
The pg_depend entry against the extension should be there, will fix.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | MauMau | 2013-06-27 11:53:24 | [9.3 doc fix] ECPG VAR command does not describe the actual specification |
| Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2013-06-27 11:29:22 | Re: MD5 aggregate |