Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

From: Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Date: 2005-09-13 17:21:32
Message-ID: m2mzmganoj.fsf@Douglas-McNaughts-Powerbook.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:

> What Tom found was that some processes are never scheduled when sched_yield is
> called. There's no reason that should be happening.

Yeah, that would probably be a bug...

-Doug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2005-09-13 17:32:42 Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Previous Message Mark Wong 2005-09-13 17:11:49 postgresql CVS callgraph data from dbt2