| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays |
| Date: | 2013-04-05 07:33:30 |
| Message-ID: | m2d2u9qvn9.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Well for what it's worth I would expect cardinality() to return the
> total number of elements in the array (per ArrayGetNItems). It's
> consistent with the spec's identification of an array as a
> "collection". You can chunk the elements into dimensions however you
> want, but it's still a collection of elements, and the cardinality is
> still the number of elements.
+1
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-04-05 07:44:53 | Re: Clang compiler warning on 9.3 HEAD |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-04-05 05:36:04 | Re: Why there is a PG_GETARG_UINT32 and PG_RETURN_UINT32? |