Re: pg_xlogdump

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlogdump
Date: 2013-02-26 16:38:00
Message-ID: m2bob73uaf.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> work today --- in particular, this proposal will break building contrib
> before the main tree has been installed.

True that.

> If somebody wants to set up a buildfarm member that occasionally tests
> PGXS building of contrib/, that's fine with me. But it isn't, and never
> will be, the main build scenario for contrib/ IMO.

I guess you just made a final vote on the whole idea of making contrib a
set of extensions maintained by the PostgreSQL commiters, then. It might
be good to document that position, so that the topic isn't raised again
each year?

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-02-26 16:38:14 Re: pg_xlogdump
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2013-02-26 16:36:23 Re: pg_xlogdump compile error