| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: procpid? |
| Date: | 2011-06-12 22:00:06 |
| Message-ID: | m2aadm3e3d.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On lör, 2011-06-11 at 16:23 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Uh, I am the first one I remember complaining about this so I don't
>> see why we should break compatibility for such a low-level problem.
>
> I complain about it every day to the wall. :)
+1 !
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-06-12 22:18:06 | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks, v3 |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2011-06-12 21:58:31 | Re: lazy vxid locks, v1 |