| From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
| Cc: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on |
| Date: | 1999-12-20 08:33:32 |
| Message-ID: | m11zyG4-0003kIC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dare I suggest
> that we should declare feature freeze *now*, and concentrate on bug
> fixes only for the next six weeks? If not, what features are on the
> near horizon?
Only if the implementation of the temp file buffered deferred
trigger event queue isn't considered a feature, and after I
committed the catalog changes I need to go on with LONG
quietly.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-12-20 11:15:08 | Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1999-12-20 07:24:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) |