| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
|---|
| From: | Joel Stevenson <joelstevenson(at)mac(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Website issue |
| Date: | 2006-08-18 16:02:24 |
| Message-ID: | p06230946c10b9336f415@[192.168.0.9] |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Is this the correct list to report issues with the www.postgresql.org
website and it's related sites? If not, I apologize, could someone
point me in the right direction?
There seems to be a problem with list archive searching, the result
set item links do not always point to the actual message that is
indicated in the list page.
STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
* Go to http://archives.postgresql.org/
* Search all archives for the words "autovacuum logging"
* Item #2 in my results is titled "2. autovacuum logging, part deux.
[0.99998]" and the html link for this is
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-05/msg00112.php .
The "cached" link is
http://search.postgresql.org/archives.search?cs=utf-8&q=autovacuum+logging&ch=http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-05/msg00112.php&fm=on
RESULTS:
* Clicking on either the title or the direct link takes me to a
pgsql-hackers list email with the subject "Semi-undocumented
functions in libpq" intead of the autovacuum related email I was
hoping to find. Clicking on the "cached" link does in fact take me
to the correct email.
EXPECTED RESULTS:
* All three links should end up at the same, correct, email.
Thanks,
Joel
| From: | Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Stevenson <joelstevenson(at)mac(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Website issue |
| Date: | 2006-08-26 20:38:47 |
| Message-ID: | 85714EE0-E043-4D6E-B600-97AFA4DBE875@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Aug 18, 2006, at 11:02 AM, Joel Stevenson wrote:
> Is this the correct list to report issues with the
> www.postgresql.org website and it's related sites? If not, I
> apologize, could someone point me in the right direction?
-www would be better...
> There seems to be a problem with list archive searching, the result
> set item links do not always point to the actual message that is
> indicated in the list page.
I believe this has been fixed.