Re: conditional FROM

Lists: pgsql-sql
From: Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: conditional FROM
Date: 2011-12-10 16:03:32
Message-ID: 20111210170332479879.3df30525@klingler.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

Good day...

I'm trying to build a query for PGSQL 9.1 where a table has two
references with only one being used depending of the type of entry..

For example, the table has following simplified structure:

portid primary key
port2node index to table node
port2card index to table card

So how can I do a conditional FROM clause in the query depending on the
column port2node and port2card?
If port2card is Null or 0 I don't want it in the FROM clause as the
query will return unneccessary duplicate
row...the same goes for port2node being Null or 0...

thanx in advance
richard


From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: conditional FROM
Date: 2011-12-10 16:17:25
Message-ID: 20111210161725.GA15506@tux
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net> wrote:

> Good day...
>
> I'm trying to build a query for PGSQL 9.1 where a table has two
> references with only one being used depending of the type of entry..
>
> For example, the table has following simplified structure:
>
> portid primary key
> port2node index to table node
> port2card index to table card
>
> So how can I do a conditional FROM clause in the query depending on the
> column port2node and port2card?
> If port2card is Null or 0 I don't want it in the FROM clause as the
> query will return unneccessary duplicate
> row...the same goes for port2node being Null or 0...

I think, you can't do that, you have to build your query and execute
that string. You should use a function to do that.

Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°


From: David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: conditional FROM
Date: 2011-12-10 16:28:29
Message-ID: 2BBB44CA-7EFA-4084-906F-6CB72AD28C6E@yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Dec 10, 2011, at 11:03, Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net> wrote:

> Good day...
>
> I'm trying to build a query for PGSQL 9.1 where a table has two
> references with only one being used depending of the type of entry..
>
> For example, the table has following simplified structure:
>
> portid primary key
> port2node index to table node
> port2card index to table card
>
> So how can I do a conditional FROM clause in the query depending on the
> column port2node and port2card?
> If port2card is Null or 0 I don't want it in the FROM clause as the
> query will return unneccessary duplicate
> row...the same goes for port2node being Null or 0...
>
>
> thanx in advance
> richard
>
>

Two options (one of which may not work for you).

1. Write two queries, one for each table, and union the results.
2. Use LEFT JOINs (somehow...)

David J.


From: Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net>
To: "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: conditional FROM
Date: 2011-12-10 17:22:42
Message-ID: 20111210182242043383.dc56d2c5@klingler.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

This seems to do the trick...

select arp.ip, arp.mac, arp.port2time, arp.time, arp.hostname, arp.vlan
from arp, port, node
where
arp.arp2port = port.portid and port.name = 'Fa1/0/1'
and port.port2node = node.nodeid
and node.name like 'nodename%'
union
select arp.ip, arp.mac, arp.port2time, arp.time, arp.hostname, arp.vlan
from arp, port, card, node
where
arp.arp2port = port.portid and port.name = 'Fa1/0/1'
and port.port2card = card.cardid
and card.card2node = node.nodeid
and node.name like 'nodename%'
;

Though I just can't order the rows anymore by inet(arp.ip) anymore...
Any hints on my ordering isn't anylonger possible?

But at least the query is way faster than before (o;
2msec instead of 650msecs (o;

thanx ina dvance
richard

On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:28:29 -0500, David Johnston wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2011, at 11:03, Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Good day...
>>
>> I'm trying to build a query for PGSQL 9.1 where a table has two
>> references with only one being used depending of the type of entry..
>>
>> For example, the table has following simplified structure:
>>
>> portid primary key
>> port2node index to table node
>> port2card index to table card
>>
>> So how can I do a conditional FROM clause in the query depending on the
>> column port2node and port2card?
>> If port2card is Null or 0 I don't want it in the FROM clause as the
>> query will return unneccessary duplicate
>> row...the same goes for port2node being Null or 0...
>>
>>
>> thanx in advance
>> richard
>>
>>
>
> Two options (one of which may not work for you).
>
> 1. Write two queries, one for each table, and union the results.
> 2. Use LEFT JOINs (somehow...)
>
> David J.


From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: conditional FROM
Date: 2011-12-10 17:30:29
Message-ID: 20111210173029.GA21557@tux
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net> wrote:

> This seems to do the trick...
>
> select arp.ip, arp.mac, arp.port2time, arp.time, arp.hostname, arp.vlan
> from arp, port, node
> where
> arp.arp2port = port.portid and port.name = 'Fa1/0/1'
> and port.port2node = node.nodeid
> and node.name like 'nodename%'
> union
> select arp.ip, arp.mac, arp.port2time, arp.time, arp.hostname, arp.vlan
> from arp, port, card, node
> where
> arp.arp2port = port.portid and port.name = 'Fa1/0/1'
> and port.port2card = card.cardid
> and card.card2node = node.nodeid
> and node.name like 'nodename%'
> ;
>
> Though I just can't order the rows anymore by inet(arp.ip) anymore...
> Any hints on my ordering isn't anylonger possible?

select * from (insert the query above here) foo order by ...

Regards...

Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°


From: Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto(dot)d(dot)sera(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: conditional FROM
Date: 2011-12-10 17:39:06
Message-ID: CAKwGa_9kSD67K48mTB_kzWTo7e=3wDwU5EBLsFSVt1Ha7L09tw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

I guess this is what you mean:

create table node(
id bigint primary key);
insert into node values (1);
insert into node values (2);

create table card(
id integer primary key);
insert into card values (1);
insert into card values (2);

create table port_activity (
portid integer primary key,
port2node bigint,
port2card integer );
alter table port_activity add constraint myconst1 foreign key (port2node)
references node (id);
alter table port_activity add constraint myconst2 foreign key (port2card)
references card (id);
insert into port_activity values (1,1,NULL);
insert into port_activity values (2,NULL,1);

select
p.portid as port,
coalesce(n.id,c.id) as destination
from
port_activity as p
left outer join node as n
on p.port2node=n.id
left outer join card as c
on p.port2card=c.id;

Best regards
Bèrto

On 10 December 2011 19:03, Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net> wrote:

> Good day...
>
> I'm trying to build a query for PGSQL 9.1 where a table has two
> references with only one being used depending of the type of entry..
>
> For example, the table has following simplified structure:
>
> portid primary key
> port2node index to table node
> port2card index to table card
>
> So how can I do a conditional FROM clause in the query depending on the
> column port2node and port2card?
> If port2card is Null or 0 I don't want it in the FROM clause as the
> query will return unneccessary duplicate
> row...the same goes for port2node being Null or 0...
>
>
> thanx in advance
> richard
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
>

--
==============================
If Pac-Man had affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in a
darkened room munching pills and listening to repetitive music.


From: Jasen Betts <jasen(at)xnet(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: conditional FROM
Date: 2011-12-10 22:32:50
Message-ID: jc0mmi$4nb$2@reversiblemaps.ath.cx
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

On 2011-12-10, Richard Klingler <richard(at)klingler(dot)net> wrote:
> Good day...
>
> I'm trying to build a query for PGSQL 9.1 where a table has two
> references with only one being used depending of the type of entry..
>
> For example, the table has following simplified structure:
>
> portid primary key
> port2node index to table node
> port2card index to table card
>
> So how can I do a conditional FROM clause in the query depending on the
> column port2node and port2card?
> If port2card is Null or 0 I don't want it in the FROM clause as the
> query will return unneccessary duplicate
> row...the same goes for port2node being Null or 0...

use left outer join.

SELECT * FROM
port
LEFT OUTER JOIN node ON node.nodeid=port.port2node
LEFT OUTER JOIN card ON card.cardid=port.port2card

or something like that.

You may find coalesce() useful to combine columns where node and card
both carry equivalent information.

--
⚂⚃ 100% natural