| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | ddl triggers |
| Date: | 2005-05-31 11:21:34 |
| Message-ID: | 429C48BE.2070302@persistent.co.in |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support
to ddl triggers.
This may be useful for tracking and auditing purposes.
I am planning on prototyping this.
Would be interested to hear any comment.
Thanks
Barnali
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ddl triggers |
| Date: | 2005-05-31 15:13:42 |
| Message-ID: | 12401.1117552422@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support
> to ddl triggers.
This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives.
regards, tom lane
| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ddl triggers |
| Date: | 2005-05-31 15:42:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200505310842.55180.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> > I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support
> > to ddl triggers.
>
> This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives.
Eh? I thought it was a TODO.
--Josh
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ddl triggers |
| Date: | 2005-05-31 15:49:06 |
| Message-ID: | 12795.1117554546@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>> I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support
>>> to ddl triggers.
>>
>> This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives.
> Eh? I thought it was a TODO.
Or "see the TODO list" ... I was looking for some small evidence of
familiarity with the previous discussions ...
regards, tom lane
| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ddl triggers |
| Date: | 2005-06-01 08:13:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1117613615.3844.862.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> > I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support
> > to ddl triggers.
>
> This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives.
Could we keep track of NOT TODO items also?
The list of ideas suggested but then rejected is growing longer and we
rely on people's memory to say what was rejected previously.
The question is where do you put this idea if you reject it? :-)
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ddl triggers |
| Date: | 2005-06-01 14:40:52 |
| Message-ID: | c2d9e70e050601074053efaec9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Could we keep track of NOT TODO items also?
>
> The question is where do you put this idea if you reject it? :-)
>
And of course a link to the thread, or an explanation on why it was
rejected. That way if someone can solve the reason for reject it maybe
a new discussion can be made.
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)