Re: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof

With ten days left in the current CommitFest, being the last
CommitFest for 9.1 development, there are presently 40 patches that
are marked either Needs Review or Waiting on Author. The 11 patches
that are Waiting on Author are the following:

Synchronous Replication, transaction-controlled
Recovery Control
SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw
FDW API
Skip validation of Foreign Keys
Self-tuning checkpoint sync spread
PL/Python explicit subtransactions
keeping timestamp of the lasts stats reset
Named restore points
pg_stat_activity.client_hostname field
log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option

If you are the author of one of these patches, you need to post an
updated patch ASAP, or wait for 9.2. A number of these patches have
been sitting for WEEKS without an update. When you post your updated
patch (or if by chance you already did), please add a link to the
CommitFest application and change the status to Needs Review. Many of
these patches likely still need a few more rounds of review before
they are committed. If you wait until February 14th at 11:59pm to
update them, they're not going to make it in.

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/inprogress

As for the patches that are marked Needs Review, some people have put
their names into the CommitFest application, indicating their intent
and commitment to review particular patches, and then have not done
so. If you are one of those people, please post your review to the
list and update the CommitFest application. If you are a reviewer who
has completed all of the reviewing you've previously signed up for,
and still want to do more, please consider jumping in on one of the
patches that still needs review, and help move the discussion along.
Even if you cannot do a full review, please review as much as you can
and post your feedback to the list. We need to determine which of
these patches are viable candidates for 9.2 and which are not. If you
are a patch author and your patch is marked as needing review, please
double-check that it still applies and has not bitrotted, and verify
that you have responded to all feedback previously given, so that if
someone has time to review your patch they can do so productively.

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Robert,

I don't see btree_gist with knn-support. I'm afraid it'll be forgotten.

Oleg
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Robert Haas wrote:

> With ten days left in the current CommitFest, being the last
> CommitFest for 9.1 development, there are presently 40 patches that
> are marked either Needs Review or Waiting on Author. The 11 patches
> that are Waiting on Author are the following:
>
> Synchronous Replication, transaction-controlled
> Recovery Control
> SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw
> FDW API
> Skip validation of Foreign Keys
> Self-tuning checkpoint sync spread
> PL/Python explicit subtransactions
> keeping timestamp of the lasts stats reset
> Named restore points
> pg_stat_activity.client_hostname field
> log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option
>
> If you are the author of one of these patches, you need to post an
> updated patch ASAP, or wait for 9.2. A number of these patches have
> been sitting for WEEKS without an update. When you post your updated
> patch (or if by chance you already did), please add a link to the
> CommitFest application and change the status to Needs Review. Many of
> these patches likely still need a few more rounds of review before
> they are committed. If you wait until February 14th at 11:59pm to
> update them, they're not going to make it in.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/inprogress
>
> As for the patches that are marked Needs Review, some people have put
> their names into the CommitFest application, indicating their intent
> and commitment to review particular patches, and then have not done
> so. If you are one of those people, please post your review to the
> list and update the CommitFest application. If you are a reviewer who
> has completed all of the reviewing you've previously signed up for,
> and still want to do more, please consider jumping in on one of the
> patches that still needs review, and help move the discussion along.
> Even if you cannot do a full review, please review as much as you can
> and post your feedback to the list. We need to determine which of
> these patches are viable candidates for 9.2 and which are not. If you
> are a patch author and your patch is marked as needing review, please
> double-check that it still applies and has not bitrotted, and verify
> that you have responded to all feedback previously given, so that if
> someone has time to review your patch they can do so productively.
>
> Thanks,
>
>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
> I don't see btree_gist with knn-support. I'm afraid it'll be forgotten.

If you don't see it there, it's because you didn't add it. The
deadline for getting your patch into the CommitFest application was
January 15th, and several reminders were sent out in advance of that
date.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Aha,

Teodor sent it to the list Dec 28, see
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D1A1677.80300%40sigaev.ru

After a month I didn't see any activity on this patch, so I
I added it to https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=350 Jan 21

Now, I realised it was too late. Added to current commitfest.

Oleg
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Robert Haas wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
>> I don't see btree_gist with knn-support. I'm afraid it'll be forgotten.
>
> If you don't see it there, it's because you didn't add it. The
> deadline for getting your patch into the CommitFest application was
> January 15th, and several reminders were sent out in advance of that
> date.
>
>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83