Quick Links

7.4, 8.0 branches @ itanium2 & icc

Lists:	pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

From:	"Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
To:	pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	7.4, 8.0 branches @ itanium2 & icc
Date:	2006-10-03 14:48:49
Message-ID:	Pine.LNX.4.64.0610031453160.12197@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Lists:	pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Having recently tried to build 7.4, and 8.0 branches on Itanium2 with ICC

http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dugong&dt=2006-09-29%2015:59:09
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dugong&dt=2006-09-29%2015:59:43

I encountered the same error as people before:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg00084.php
But the patch from this thread wasn't applied.

I don't know whether it's worth fixing that for old branches ... ,
but I send the patches...

Is it worth applying ?

Regards,
Sergey

*******************************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy/Sternberg Astronomical Institute
Tel: +49-6221-528-349
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math
E-mail: math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
ia64_pg8.0.diff	text/plain	865 bytes
ia64_pg7.4.diff	text/plain	904 bytes

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
Cc:	pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: 7.4, 8.0 branches @ itanium2 & icc
Date:	2006-10-03 16:17:18
Message-ID:	26513.1159892238@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Lists:	pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
> Having recently tried to build 7.4, and 8.0 branches on Itanium2 with ICC

7.4 is not going to work with ICC anyway without considerably more
extensive changes (eg, configure hacking). It might make sense to
apply this patch to 8.0 but I can't get all that excited about it.

regards, tom lane

From:	"Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
To:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: 7.4, 8.0 branches @ itanium2 & icc
Date:	2006-10-03 16:21:30
Message-ID:	Pine.LNX.4.64.0610032018250.12197@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Lists:	pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
>> Having recently tried to build 7.4, and 8.0 branches on Itanium2 with ICC
>
> 7.4 is not going to work with ICC anyway without considerably more
> extensive changes (eg, configure hacking). It might make sense to
> apply this patch to 8.0 but I can't get all that excited about it.
>

It worked for me with both 7.4 & 8.0 after applying my patch. (and make
check worked ...) ( at least with icc 9.1.x)

Regards,
Sergey

From:	"Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
To:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: 7.4, 8.0 branches @ itanium2 & icc
Date:	2006-10-03 23:45:11
Message-ID:	Pine.LNX.4.64.0610040339381.12197@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Lists:	pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

I guess that fix is just no-cost fix. I don't see any problems that
may arise from it. So my personal opinion is that it should be applied...

Regards,
Sergey