8.0.0rc4 / OpenBSD 3.6 / amd64 success

Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
From: Andy Warner <andy(at)andy(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <psql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: 8.0.0rc4 / OpenBSD 3.6 / amd64 success
Date: 2005-01-10 01:54:36
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0501091944021.16715-100000@drunkard.rmccolo.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

I'm not sure what form success reports are supposed to take.
I glanced at the website and didn't see anything obvious, but
I didn't dig too hard.

I have a box running 8.0.0rc4 on OpenBSD 3.6 with an AMD Opteron
(amd64). It configured cleanly. The first pass with make got stuck
in a loop and never came out, but the second pass worked fine when
I piped it to 'more' to see what was going on. Seems odd to me, but
it worked. I haven't loaded any real data yet, but I can create test
databases and access them fine. The performance with one sample table
and a bit of shared memory tweaking is really good. (Blows away a
comparable 2.4 Xeon on a not quite apples-to-apples test - based
on wallclock timing).

Let me know if either of these is the wrong address or you'd like more /
less info (in the future).

--
Andy Warner


From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andy Warner <andy(at)andy(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PORTS] 8.0.0rc4 / OpenBSD 3.6 / amd64 success
Date: 2005-01-15 08:33:51
Message-ID: 200501150933.51480.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Andy Warner wrote:
> I'm not sure what form success reports are supposed to take.
> I glanced at the website and didn't see anything obvious, but
> I didn't dig too hard.

See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-12/msg00314.php
for the information we would like to see.

Also, cross-posting will not make your report noticed better..

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/