Tidied up patch status page

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Tidied up patch status page
Date: 2007-07-07 08:07:32
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0707070402110.28118@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm not sure what order the patches at at
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in
before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by
the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tidied up patch status page
Date: 2007-07-07 09:59:18
Message-ID: 468F63F6.5000809@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith wrote:
> I'm not sure what order the patches at at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed
> in before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted
> by the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

well the original order was basically arbitrary(basically the order I
copied it over from my notes) - alvaro already resorted it once though ...
It's actually a pity that we are not running a more recent version of
mediawiki because newer versions do have things like sortable tables and
other improvments that might be of help.

Stefan


From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tidied up patch status page
Date: 2007-07-07 13:00:43
Message-ID: 200707071300.l67D0hv02867@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith wrote:
> I'm not sure what order the patches at at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in
> before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by
> the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

Yep, much better. I think we didn't reorder it in the past to avoid
HTML churn but in the future I will try to keep that ordering.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tidied up patch status page
Date: 2007-07-07 16:56:36
Message-ID: 4000.1183827396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not sure what order the patches at at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in
> before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by
> the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz
"Maintaining cluster order on insert"

regards, tom lane


From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tidied up patch status page
Date: 2007-07-07 21:29:31
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0707071723220.25651@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz
> "Maintaining cluster order on insert"

It's back. I double-checked: 40 patches before, 40 now. I thought that
I was safe editing this bugger at 5am, but Stefan was watching; I think I
lost that one as part of the merge conflict confusion from the edit he did
before I was finished proofreading.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD