Re: Patch for Statement.getGeneratedKeys()

Lists: pgsql-jdbc
From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: sirapitt(at)hotmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for Statement.getGeneratedKeys()
Date: 2008-02-11 05:44:34
Message-ID: 47AFE0C2.60002@ejurka.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

sirapitt(at)hotmail(dot)com wrote:
> Kris, Whatever became of the effort to patch the JDBC driver to
> support the getGeneratedKeys() function call?

After a fair amount of back and forth, a patch was posted, but it was
known not to be 100% complete and the author didn't seem interested in
completing it himself. With the 8.3 release happening I had a number of
things to do to get that out the door, so I didn't have time to
review/complete the latest posted patch. I will return to it at some
point, but I'm finding less and less time to work on the driver.

Kris Jurka


From: Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch for Statement.getGeneratedKeys()
Date: 2008-02-12 01:04:36
Message-ID: 200802112004.37155.jdevisser@digitalfairway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Monday 11 February 2008 00:44:34 Kris Jurka wrote:
> but I'm finding less and less time to work on the driver.

Is there a TODO list somewhere of things you need fixed?

jan

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan de Visser                     jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com

                Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!
--------------------------------------------------------------


From: Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch for Statement.getGeneratedKeys()
Date: 2008-02-12 01:06:17
Message-ID: 200802112006.17373.jdevisser@digitalfairway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Monday 11 February 2008 20:04:36 Jan de Visser wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008 00:44:34 Kris Jurka wrote:
> > but I'm finding less and less time to work on the driver.
>
> Is there a TODO list somewhere of things you need fixed?

Scratch that. Found it. Let me restate to: "Is there anything you want other
people to have a go at"?

jan

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan de Visser                     jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com

                Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!
--------------------------------------------------------------


From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for Statement.getGeneratedKeys()
Date: 2008-02-12 01:25:30
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0802112009120.13230@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Jan de Visser wrote:

> On Monday 11 February 2008 20:04:36 Jan de Visser wrote:
>>
>> Is there a TODO list somewhere of things you need fixed?
>

There is the todo list on the website[1], but that doesn't have everything
and is not updated frequently. I've got a couple of mail folders with
isses and potential items as well. A little while ago I started to put
some things in the pgfoundry trackers[2], but when I ran into a gforge bug
I stopped. I think that's the way to go to publicize and categorize
various items, so I'll try to empty my mailbox into the trackers this
week.

> "Is there anything you want other people to have a go at"?
>

Yes. Everything. There are no items that I specially reserve for only
myself to work on. I don't have a list of what's high/low priority and
what's easy/hard handy, but I'll probably have a better idea once I go
through the list. The traditional open source response is to work on
something you find interesting or need yourself, but if anyone out there
is just interested in doing some development and they don't really care
what, I can probably help you find an appropriate item.

Kris Jurka

[1] http://jdbc.postgresql.org/todo.html
[2] http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?group_id=1000224


From: Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch for Statement.getGeneratedKeys()
Date: 2008-02-12 02:22:28
Message-ID: 200802112122.28285.jdevisser@digitalfairway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Monday 11 February 2008 20:25:30 Kris Jurka wrote:
> The traditional open source response is to work on
> something you find interesting or need yourself, but if anyone out there
> is just interested in doing some development and they don't really care
> what, I can probably help you find an appropriate item.

Well, I must admit that my interest here is purely corporate; we want the
driver to be as stable and fast as possible. We haven't had particular
concerns in either of those areas, but if you do (or have ideas to make stuff
faster or less memory heavy), please let me know and I'll see what I can have
a whack at.

Also, if you need help doing the more menial work related to releasing etc,
let me know to.

jan

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan de Visser                     jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com

                Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!
--------------------------------------------------------------


From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for Statement.getGeneratedKeys()
Date: 2008-02-17 16:53:46
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.64.0802171148050.23373@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Jan de Visser wrote:

> Well, I must admit that my interest here is purely corporate; we want
> the driver to be as stable and fast as possible. We haven't had
> particular concerns in either of those areas, but if you do (or have
> ideas to make stuff faster or less memory heavy), please let me know and
> I'll see what I can have a whack at.
>

I've dumped most of the open issues I'm aware of onto the pgfoundry
trackers here in case anyone wants to take a look at them or let me know
what I've forgotten.

http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?group_id=1000224

Kris Jurka