Review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2011-11-22 13:11:32
Message-ID: D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C20726D0FB@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I tried to look at the patch, but it does not apply to current master,
probably because of bit rot.

Can you submit an updated version?

The patch contains docs and regression tests and is context diff.
I'll mark it "waiting for author".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2011-11-22 14:04:25
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBzT+iiYnGDc4nMdjjuqbTVRp2bVoiAJ2jXT=EHXkgG+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/11/22 Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>:
> I tried to look at the patch, but it does not apply to current master,
> probably because of bit rot.
>
> Can you submit an updated version?
>
> The patch contains docs and regression tests and is context diff.
> I'll mark it "waiting for author".

please wait, I plan to work on this topic at thursday.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>