[PATCH] Sort contents entries in reference documentation

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: "Colin 't Hart" <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: [PATCH] Sort contents entries in reference documentation
Date: 2013-11-13 09:40:31
Message-ID: CAMon-aRVhO0tu3sBWS1aNF=0wDDZ-vRPOhmmHfCGbgeasE1UTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

While looking at the documentation on SELECT I noticed that the
entries in reference.sgml aren't sorted correctly -- psql \h does have
them in the correct order.

Attached a trivial patch to fix this.

In addition, reference.sgml doesn't have entries for TABLE or WITH
which should link to ref/select.sgml but I couldn't figure out how to
achieve this. psql \h does have this so the reference page probably
should too.

Cheers,

Colin

Attachment Content-Type Size
reference.sgml.diff text/plain 832 bytes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Colin 't Hart" <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sort contents entries in reference documentation
Date: 2013-11-15 13:57:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZDnF4AWD3jjumAbSAq4uUeAfwzBMOhAUEGMRXW1-b2GQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Colin 't Hart <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While looking at the documentation on SELECT I noticed that the
> entries in reference.sgml aren't sorted correctly -- psql \h does have
> them in the correct order.
>
> Attached a trivial patch to fix this.

Committed and back-patched to 9.3.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company