| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension |
| Date: | 2012-04-15 10:47:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRADpQvAeZjsZV6uswuKwhGLj7NdnVA-CZaYH_xZNa_HbA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files?
Regards
Pavel
| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension |
| Date: | 2012-04-15 14:32:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4F8ADBF9.2030606@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15.04.2012 13:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files?
See section 35.15.4. Extension Updates, paragraph starting with "The
update mechanism can be used to solve an important special case:
converting a "loose" collection of objects into an extension."
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension |
| Date: | 2012-04-15 16:48:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCGZT5qq9ZqookVGAiA3gAj7KfGf56udPwX1t3_79pXdw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012/4/15 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
> On 15.04.2012 13:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files?
>
>
> See section 35.15.4. Extension Updates, paragraph starting with "The update
> mechanism can be used to solve an important special case: converting a
> "loose" collection of objects into an extension."
>
I understand better now.
Thank you
Pavel
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com