Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c

Lists: pgsql-bugs
From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
Date: 2011-12-20 17:50:37
Message-ID: CAEYLb_VYydAMMfqh_RrHkdtszNU-Gh78zxbjfRSafHBgOeJrUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Line 834 of heapam.c has the following comment:

/*
* This is formatted so oddly so that the correspondence to the macro
* definition in access/heapam.h is maintained.
*/

In fact, that macro is defined in access/htup.h...should it be?

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
Date: 2011-12-20 17:53:38
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+xabfzUTXUHp7qJDo=2oHXfL7b_eFnxOArzr-UVX4heA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Line 834 of heapam.c has the following comment:
>
> /*
>  * This is formatted so oddly so that the correspondence to the macro
>  * definition in access/heapam.h is maintained.
>  */
>
> In fact, that macro is defined in access/htup.h...should it be?

IMHO comment is wrong, code is in the right place.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
Date: 2011-12-20 18:11:36
Message-ID: 10219.1324404696@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> In fact, that macro is defined in access/htup.h...should it be?

> IMHO comment is wrong, code is in the right place.

It used to be in heapam.h ... evidently, whoever moved it missed this
comment.

regards, tom lane


From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
Date: 2011-12-21 11:21:44
Message-ID: CAEYLb_Vj0hPM5-0Uto_L14OFVf2KbpTvEpDn4qxTEqoz+5kHSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 20 December 2011 18:11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> In fact, that macro is defined in access/htup.h...should it be?
>
>> IMHO comment is wrong, code is in the right place.
>
> It used to be in heapam.h ... evidently, whoever moved it missed this
> comment.

I imagined that that was the case.

It's a fairly inconsequential bug, but it is worth fixing...

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
Date: 2012-01-17 01:37:52
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY0uA3PtUeF85GsU=OAZQniL76+un58fO0rQsGk0bYkCQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 20 December 2011 18:11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> In fact, that macro is defined in access/htup.h...should it be?
>>
>>> IMHO comment is wrong, code is in the right place.
>>
>> It used to be in heapam.h ... evidently, whoever moved it missed this
>> comment.
>
> I imagined that that was the case.
>
> It's a fairly inconsequential bug, but it is worth fixing...

Fixed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
Date: 2012-01-17 12:52:24
Message-ID: CAEYLb_UMssVfMh1ofxx3Ru5c5ouPu33r-uZ00GgdmH_RitV32w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 17 January 2012 01:37, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> It's a fairly inconsequential bug, but it is worth fixing...
>
> Fixed.

Thanks.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services