ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc

Lists: pgsql-sql
From: Samuel Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc
Date: 2011-09-21 23:35:07
Message-ID: CAEV0TzB5GDuaG=7OOv_7m6OWagAkkUmkeh=1a62E46o4wKdtgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

I've got a stored proc (which worked fine in 8.3 and 8.4) that is declared
as such:

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION reporting_mgmt.aggregate_timescales_impl (
div_start TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE,
* tbl_schema VARCHAR, *
tbl_root VARCHAR,
fine_timescale VARCHAR,
coarse_timescale VARCHAR,
coarser_timescale VARCHAR,
fact_fields VARCHAR,
dim_fields VARCHAR,
sum_fields VARCHAR)
RETURNS INTEGER
AS $$

Within that proc, I've got the following line:

IF EXISTS ( SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables
WHERE table_schema = tbl_schema
AND table_name = tbl_fine_part_old ) THEN
IF EXISTS ( SELECT status FROM reporting_mgmt.etl_status AS e
* WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema*
AND tbl_root = e.tbl_root
AND div_start_old = e.fine_time
AND coarse_timescale = e.coarse_scale
AND status = 0 ) THEN

And in 9.0, it is generating the following error:

ERROR: column reference "tbl_schema" is ambiguous
LINE 2: WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema
^
DETAIL: It could refer to either a PL/pgSQL variable or a table column.
QUERY: SELECT EXISTS ( SELECT status FROM reporting_mgmt.etl_status AS e
WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema
AND tbl_root = e.tbl_root
AND div_start_old = e.fine_time
AND coarse_timescale = e.coarse_scale
AND status = 0 )
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "aggregate_timescales_impl" line 52 at IF
PL/pgSQL function "aggregate_timescales" line 23 at RETURN

Of course, it is true that tbl_schema could refer to the column in table
etl_status, except older versions of postgres seemed to correctly figure out
that comparing a column to itself isn't terribly useful, so it must be
referring to the pl/pgsql variable rather than the table column.

I'm happy to modify the proc definition, except that I am unsure how to do
so other than to rename the variable, which is my least favourite way to do
that. I'd far rather qualify the name somehow, so that it knows that I am
refering to a local variable, if at all possible. Suggestions?


From: "David Johnston" <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: "'Samuel Gendler'" <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc
Date: 2011-09-21 23:49:05
Message-ID: 00c301cc78b9$0ca38e30$25eaaa90$@yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

From: pgsql-sql-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-sql-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]
On Behalf Of Samuel Gendler
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:35 PM
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [SQL] ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc

I've got a stored proc (which worked fine in 8.3 and 8.4) that is declared
as such:

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION reporting_mgmt.aggregate_timescales_impl (

div_start TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE,

tbl_schema VARCHAR,

tbl_root VARCHAR,

fine_timescale VARCHAR,

coarse_timescale VARCHAR,

coarser_timescale VARCHAR,

fact_fields VARCHAR,

dim_fields VARCHAR,

sum_fields VARCHAR)

RETURNS INTEGER

AS $$

Within that proc, I've got the following line:

IF EXISTS ( SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables

WHERE table_schema = tbl_schema

AND table_name = tbl_fine_part_old ) THEN

IF EXISTS ( SELECT status FROM reporting_mgmt.etl_status AS e

WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema

AND tbl_root = e.tbl_root

AND div_start_old = e.fine_time

AND coarse_timescale = e.coarse_scale

AND status = 0 ) THEN

And in 9.0, it is generating the following error:

ERROR: column reference "tbl_schema" is ambiguous

LINE 2: WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema

^

DETAIL: It could refer to either a PL/pgSQL variable or a table column.

QUERY: SELECT EXISTS ( SELECT status FROM reporting_mgmt.etl_status AS e

WHERE tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema

AND tbl_root = e.tbl_root

AND div_start_old = e.fine_time

AND coarse_timescale = e.coarse_scale

AND status = 0 )

CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "aggregate_timescales_impl" line 52 at IF

PL/pgSQL function "aggregate_timescales" line 23 at RETURN

Of course, it is true that tbl_schema could refer to the column in table
etl_status, except older versions of postgres seemed to correctly figure out
that comparing a column to itself isn't terribly useful, so it must be
referring to the pl/pgsql variable rather than the table column.

I'm happy to modify the proc definition, except that I am unsure how to do
so other than to rename the variable, which is my least favourite way to do
that. I'd far rather qualify the name somehow, so that it knows that I am
refering to a local variable, if at all possible. Suggestions?

Not tested but I think all local variables are implicitly scoped to the
function name so you should be able to do the following:

WHERE reporting_mgmt.aggregate_timescales_impl.tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema

You are going to have the same problem with other fields as well (e.g.,
tbl_root).

I believe there is some way to define the function so that it does not throw
that particular error; it would be up to you make sure that the ambiguity is
being resolved correctly (which it should in this particular case). Maybe
look for "SET" variables.

You could also copy the tbl_schema variable value into a different variable.

DECLARE tbl_schema_copy VARCHAR; tbl_schema_copy := tbl_schema;

. WHERE tbl_schema_copy = e.tbl_schema .

David J.


From: Samuel Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>
To: David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc
Date: 2011-09-21 23:55:28
Message-ID: CAEV0TzDNpTyOnEdHes3eFOv2Dcs_SHyoPymd=hTYH4dASyS7ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:49 PM, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:

> ** **
>
> *
> *
>
> Not tested but I think all local variables are implicitly scoped to the
> function name so you should be able to do the following:****
>
> ** **
>
> WHERE reporting_mgmt.aggregate_timescales_impl.tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema**
> **
>
> **
>

Yep. It is also possible to change the db behaviour globally or on a
per-function basis

from
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/plpgsql-implementation.html

"To change this behavior on a system-wide basis, set the configuration
parameter plpgsql.variable_conflict to one of error, use_variable, or
use_column(where error is the factory default)."

You can also set the behavior on a function-by-function basis, by inserting
one of these special commands at the start of the function text:

#variable_conflict error
#variable_conflict use_variable

#variable_conflict use_column

Sorry for jumping straight a mailing list query. It was actually relatively
easy to find in the docs. Now to figure out if the function name scoping
trick works in 8.4 so that I can modify my procs prior to upgrading my db.

--sam


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David Johnston" <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "'Samuel Gendler'" <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ambiguous local variable name in 9.0 proc
Date: 2011-09-22 00:00:50
Message-ID: 3450.1316649650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

"David Johnston" <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> On Behalf Of Samuel Gendler
> I'm happy to modify the proc definition, except that I am unsure how to do
> so other than to rename the variable, which is my least favourite way to do
> that. I'd far rather qualify the name somehow, so that it knows that I am
> refering to a local variable, if at all possible. Suggestions?

> Not tested but I think all local variables are implicitly scoped to the
> function name so you should be able to do the following:
> WHERE reporting_mgmt.aggregate_timescales_impl.tbl_schema = e.tbl_schema

More accurately: you can qualify a local variable's name with the label
attached to the block in which it's declared; or with the function's
name if the variable is a function parameter. See the fine manual:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/plpgsql-structure.html

> I believe there is some way to define the function so that it does not throw
> that particular error; it would be up to you make sure that the ambiguity is
> being resolved correctly (which it should in this particular case).

Yes, see variable_conflict in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/plpgsql-implementation.html

I wouldn't really recommend turning off the conflict detection, though.
We put it in because of the number of hours people had wasted on
unrecognized conflicts.

regards, tom lane