Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
Date: 2012-02-18 16:58:19
Message-ID: 71e857315a4f4cdeb903820c1b34a572.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.

Is this intentional? (perhaps because of the risk of restoring into the wrong db?)

I would prefer if it would honor the PGDATABASE variable, but if it does ignore it intentionally,
the following (from 9.2devel docs) is obviously incorrect:

"This utility, like most other PostgreSQL utilities, also uses the environment variables supported
by libpq (see Section 31.13)."

I could look into fixing one (binary) or the other (docs), but what /is/ the preferred behavior?

thanks,

Erik Rijkers


From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
Date: 2012-02-19 05:27:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ1kyWcpxdLHQhaNM4wni5rKzNO4abU8YYxr80r8oKLig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.

What exactly do you mean by "ignores"? pg_restore prints results to
standard output unless a database name is specified. AFAIK, there's
no syntax to say "I want a direct-to-database restore to whatever you
think the default database is".

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
Date: 2012-02-19 06:18:56
Message-ID: ccdc5f622952d885586a396fa133aa6d.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
>
> What exactly do you mean by "ignores"? pg_restore prints results to
> standard output unless a database name is specified. AFAIK, there's
> no syntax to say "I want a direct-to-database restore to whatever you
> think the default database is".

That's right, and that seems contradictory with:

"This utility [pg_restore], like most other PostgreSQL utilities, also uses the environment
variables supported by libpq (see Section 31.13)."

as pg_restore does 'ignore' (for want of a better word) PGDATABASE.

But I think I can conclude from your reply that that behaviour is indeed intentional.

thanks,

Erik Rijkers


From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
Date: 2012-02-19 13:02:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZybB5k7J01LeTSHX9bO2R+52mBwU_SudQRpm-P3SQu_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>>> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
>>
>> What exactly do you mean by "ignores"?  pg_restore prints results to
>> standard output unless a database name is specified.  AFAIK, there's
>> no syntax to say "I want a direct-to-database restore to whatever you
>> think the default database is".
>
> That's right, and that seems contradictory with:
>
> "This utility [pg_restore], like most other PostgreSQL utilities, also uses the environment
> variables supported by libpq (see Section 31.13)."
>
> as pg_restore does 'ignore' (for want of a better word) PGDATABASE.
>
> But I think I can conclude from your reply that that behaviour is indeed intentional.

It is, because we want there to be a way of converting a custom or tar
format archive back to text. I think that probably works out for the
best anyway, since pg_restore is a sufficiently dangerous operation
that you want to be darn sure you're not doing it on the wrong
database. dropdb also requires a database name, while createdb does
not, for similar reasons...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
Date: 2012-02-19 15:25:55
Message-ID: 4F411483.6080207@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/19/2012 08:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Erik Rijkers<er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers<er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>>>> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
>>> What exactly do you mean by "ignores"? pg_restore prints results to
>>> standard output unless a database name is specified. AFAIK, there's
>>> no syntax to say "I want a direct-to-database restore to whatever you
>>> think the default database is".
>> That's right, and that seems contradictory with:
>>
>> "This utility [pg_restore], like most other PostgreSQL utilities, also uses the environment
>> variables supported by libpq (see Section 31.13)."
>>
>> as pg_restore does 'ignore' (for want of a better word) PGDATABASE.
>>
>> But I think I can conclude from your reply that that behaviour is indeed intentional.
> It is, because we want there to be a way of converting a custom or tar
> format archive back to text. I think that probably works out for the
> best anyway, since pg_restore is a sufficiently dangerous operation
> that you want to be darn sure you're not doing it on the wrong
> database. dropdb also requires a database name, while createdb does
> not, for similar reasons...

Right, I think we probably need to adjust the docs slightly to match
this reality.

cheers

andrew


From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore ignores PGDATABASE
Date: 2012-08-27 19:27:19
Message-ID: 20120827192719.GU11088@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:25:55AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/19/2012 08:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Erik Rijkers<er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> >>On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers<er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> >>>>pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
> >>>What exactly do you mean by "ignores"? pg_restore prints results to
> >>>standard output unless a database name is specified. AFAIK, there's
> >>>no syntax to say "I want a direct-to-database restore to whatever you
> >>>think the default database is".
> >>That's right, and that seems contradictory with:
> >>
> >>"This utility [pg_restore], like most other PostgreSQL utilities, also uses the environment
> >>variables supported by libpq (see Section 31.13)."
> >>
> >>as pg_restore does 'ignore' (for want of a better word) PGDATABASE.
> >>
> >>But I think I can conclude from your reply that that behaviour is indeed intentional.
> >It is, because we want there to be a way of converting a custom or tar
> >format archive back to text. I think that probably works out for the
> >best anyway, since pg_restore is a sufficiently dangerous operation
> >that you want to be darn sure you're not doing it on the wrong
> >database. dropdb also requires a database name, while createdb does
> >not, for similar reasons...
>
> Right, I think we probably need to adjust the docs slightly to match
> this reality.

Done, with the attached patch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
env.diff text/x-diff 813 bytes