| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Small 9.1 documentation fix (SSPI auth) |
| Date: | 2011-06-24 22:07:04 |
| Message-ID: | iu31q8$764$1@dough.gmane.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we
forgot to fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I
also put that four-liner into any CFs?
--
Christian
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| sspi-doc.patch | text/plain | 1.1 KB |
| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Small 9.1 documentation fix (SSPI auth) |
| Date: | 2011-06-27 14:40:28 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinPs1ScQJbit46Z2uZsWoAFhtPoYQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> wrote:
> When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we forgot to
> fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I also put that
> four-liner into any CFs?
I have committed a slightly different wording change to fix this
problem. Let me know whether it looks OK...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Small 9.1 documentation fix (SSPI auth) |
| Date: | 2011-06-27 16:26:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4E08AF31.7060301@chrullrich.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Christian Ullrich<chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> wrote:
>> When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we forgot to
>> fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I also put that
>> four-liner into any CFs?
> I have committed a slightly different wording change to fix this
> problem. Let me know whether it looks OK...
It does. Thanks for fixing.
--
Christian