Lists: | pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a datab |
Date: | 2011-04-10 18:53:39 |
Message-ID: | E1Q8zlT-0000dB-OS@gemulon.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a database name, in pg_hba.conf.
Per gripe from Josh Berkus.
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/ed557a373c406bbb2a1843544ebbd856ca4cac47
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/libpq/hba.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a datab |
Date: | 2011-04-11 01:47:45 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=1mSiEn-zdOEUOjuFzvyvh2tYJiQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a database name, in pg_hba.conf.
Is it worth backporting this change to 9.0?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a datab |
Date: | 2011-04-11 02:17:29 |
Message-ID: | 4DA264B9.1020906@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 04/10/2011 09:47 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a database name, in pg_hba.conf.
> Is it worth backporting this change to 9.0?
>
>
I didn't because it's a behaviour change, but arguably it's just us
being ever so slightly more permissive, and nothing that now works would
change in any way, so we possibly could.
cheers
andrew
From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a datab |
Date: | 2011-04-11 16:20:54 |
Message-ID: | 4DA32A66.9050606@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 04/10/2011 10:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 04/10/2011 09:47 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
>> wrote:
>>> Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a database
>>> name, in pg_hba.conf.
>> Is it worth backporting this change to 9.0?
>>
>>
>
> I didn't because it's a behaviour change, but arguably it's just us
> being ever so slightly more permissive, and nothing that now works
> would change in any way, so we possibly could.
>
>
Well, nobody seems to be very fussed about this idea, so unless someone
objects I'll do this in 24 hours.
cheers
andrew