Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | patches that could use additional reviewers |
Date: | 2011-02-09 18:45:11 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikKEH8Cy3MEfjY2eyvpJte_3LSCHvFafLGdCXiN@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:09 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Frankly, I think you should surrender some of those 14 and cajole some other folks to take on more.
>>
>> Happily... only trouble is, I suck at cajoling. Even my begging is
>> distinctly sub-par.
>>
>> Pleeeeeeeease?
>
> Erm, I've been through the commitfest app a couple of different times,
> but have ignored things which are marked 'Needs Reivew' when there's a
> reviewer listed...
>
> If there are patches where you're marked as the reviewer but you don't
> have time to review them or want help, take your name off as a reviewer
> for them and/or speak up and explicitly ask for help. I'm not going to
> start reviewing something if I think someone else is already working on
> it..
Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or
Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that
could use more eyes:
MULTISET functions
Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards
A few other ones that could use more reviewers include:
range types
key locks
widen scale factor limit from pgbench
And your patch could probably use another reviewer too, if anyone else
is looking for stuff to help with:
log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option
And there are a few patches with no reviewer at all.
PL/Python invalidate composite argument functions
PL/Python tracebacks
contrib/btree_gist (submitted very late)
SQL/MED - file_fdw
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: patches that could use additional reviewers |
Date: | 2011-02-09 19:10:28 |
Message-ID: | 20110209191028.GW4116@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or
> Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that
> could use more eyes:
>
> MULTISET functions
I'll work on this one.
> Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards
I'll take a look at this one too, but I'm not that familiar with the
xlog code, etc, so I'm not sure if I'll be able to comment on
correctness...
> A few other ones that could use more reviewers include:
>
> range types
> key locks
If I can get through the others, I'll try and come back and look at
these.
> widen scale factor limit from pgbench
I was already starting to look at this one, actually. :)
> And your patch could probably use another reviewer too, if anyone else
> is looking for stuff to help with:
>
> log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option
Not sure if it counts if I review it. ;)
> And there are a few patches with no reviewer at all.
>
> PL/Python invalidate composite argument functions
> PL/Python tracebacks
I thought from the other threads that we had someone working the
PL/Pyton patches..? :/
> contrib/btree_gist (submitted very late)
Looks like this one might just be committable w/o additional review, but
if it's still hanging around, I might be able to help.
> SQL/MED - file_fdw
Ditto on this.
Alright, I've marked myself as a reviewer for the ones I'll look at in
the next couple days. The others are up for grabs for others, any
takers on additional reviewers for them?
Thanks,
Stephen
From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: patches that could use additional reviewers |
Date: | 2011-02-09 19:32:07 |
Message-ID: | B5F34A8BF99F045E14040D3E@amenophis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On 9. Februar 2011 13:45:11 -0500 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or
> Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that
> could use more eyes:
I'd happily jump in and look into one of those, but before mid of next week
i really have no spare time to come up with something :(
--
Thanks
Bernd
From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: patches that could use additional reviewers |
Date: | 2011-02-10 08:49:41 |
Message-ID: | 20110210084941.GB8666@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[Cc: trimmed]
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:45:11PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> A few other ones that could use more reviewers include:
> key locks
I'll take a look at this one.
From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: patches that could use additional reviewers |
Date: | 2011-02-10 15:19:58 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinfLLk7AaiXFg14sgRVhPPiNAd4MCoLndX96w3m@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> A few other ones that could use more reviewers include:
I've just corrected the status of a few patches in the CommitFest
application. In particular, I set the following back to Needs Review.
SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw
Self-tuning checkpoint sync spread
determining client_encoding from client locale
If anyone can jump in, that would be great.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company