| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
|---|
| From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Tidy up boolean data type page |
| Date: | 2010-07-22 22:02:21 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimdvlkNK7MPeoxIYjWFqVM8AYRRJ0FM3BUNzM5-@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hi all,
I wanted to clean up the boolean data type documentation page a bit,
so thought the following was needed:
- use a data type table like most of the other main data types so
it's more uniform (the the size of a boolean is only mentioned at the
very end and looks a bit odd, so removed that too)
- move the reference to the usage example to before the example
- minor text change in the first sentence so that it doesn't look
like it reads "boolean.boolean"
I've attached a patch with these changes, although feel free to list
the many reasons why this is a bad idea. ;)
Thanks
Thom
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| docs-boolean-type-tidy-up.patch | text/x-patch | 2.1 KB |
| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Tidy up boolean data type page |
| Date: | 2010-07-24 12:18:08 |
| Message-ID: | 1279973888.22066.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On tor, 2010-07-22 at 23:02 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to clean up the boolean data type documentation page a bit,
> so thought the following was needed:
>
> - use a data type table like most of the other main data types so
> it's more uniform (the the size of a boolean is only mentioned at the
> very end and looks a bit odd, so removed that too)
> - move the reference to the usage example to before the example
> - minor text change in the first sentence so that it doesn't look
> like it reads "boolean.boolean"
>
> I've attached a patch with these changes, although feel free to list
> the many reasons why this is a bad idea. ;)
Looks good to me. Committed to 9.0 and 9.1.