| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
|---|
| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, 'Barry Lind' <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: shutdown problems on win32 |
| Date: | 2004-03-17 06:17:09 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F396@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
[note to self: regardless of eagerness level, engage brain, check
assumptions, THEN post :-)]
> > Here is what I have noticed that is strange: when the
[snip]
> > postmaster and four postgres processes. Whereas on linux I
> > only see 4 (1 + 3). Then when I exit psql only one of the two extra
> > processes goes away.
>
> That is strange. I've got it too. Looks like the extra process is the
> BackgroundWriter, and it is looping forever in
> BufferBackgroundWriter. I'll look into it.
Yep. It is sitting there, looping forever, doing exactly what it is supposed
to do afaics.
When you said "on linux", that wouldn't be a previous version of postgres
would it?
> > linux. Is this expected behavior? Could this be contributing to my
> > shutdown problems?
>
> No, on both counts.
Make that Yes for the first, No for the second.
Crawling back to my hole in great embarrassment,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| From: | Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: shutdown problems on win32 |
| Date: | 2004-03-17 15:59:22 |
| Message-ID: | 405875DA.8080003@xythos.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> When you said "on linux", that wouldn't be a previous version of postgres
> would it?
>
I'm the one that should crawl back into a hole. Comparing 7.4 on linux
to 7.5 on devel, what was I thinking :-)
I should have been able to figure that one out myself.
--Barry