Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches |
---|
From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | win32 open patch for held unlink |
Date: | 2004-03-16 03:02:20 |
Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F38A@harris.memetrics.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
For application to HEAD, following community review. [open.c destined for
src/port]
Win32 people: This has been kicked around on the thread for a bit, I've not
been able to break it, but am still uncomfortable that it appears a novel
solution. If you can see any reason why this approach should not be adopted,
speak up now (or forever hold your transactions?).
heers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
open.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.6 KB |
open.c | application/octet-stream | 2.5 KB |
From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: win32 open patch for held unlink |
Date: | 2004-03-16 03:09:02 |
Message-ID: | 200403160309.i2G392S02956@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Claudio, how does this handle renames if the file is open by someone
else? Does this remove the need to loop over the rename?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> For application to HEAD, following community review. [open.c destined for
> src/port]
>
> Win32 people: This has been kicked around on the thread for a bit, I've not
> been able to break it, but am still uncomfortable that it appears a novel
> solution. If you can see any reason why this approach should not be adopted,
> speak up now (or forever hold your transactions?).
>
> heers,
> Claudio
>
> ---
> Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
> For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
> <a
> href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
> ailpolicy.html</a>
>
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073