Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | "Greg Fausak" <lgfausak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | xml plans for postgres? |
Date: | 2008-08-24 16:19:24 |
Message-ID: | 8c7b802f0808240919i2abeb2edydd7840a779057730@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Recently Postgres has added a data type 'xml' which allows for
a well formed document to be inserted as a column in a Postgres database.
At the moment it doesnot have much utility, you can *almost* get the
same thing done with a text column. It's obviously the first step.
Is there a document that describes the direction Postgres
will take relative to xml technology? XQuery, XUpdate and XSLT
are very different approaches that could compliment or severely disrupt
Postgres' evolution.
I personally am very excited about the potential but I'd like to get
the pulse of the community.
Thank you,
-g
--
Greg Fausak
greg(at)thursday(dot)com
From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, greg(at)thursday(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: xml plans for postgres? |
Date: | 2008-08-24 20:00:56 |
Message-ID: | 200808242300.57375.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday 24 August 2008 19:19:24 Greg Fausak wrote:
> Is there a document that describes the direction Postgres
> will take relative to xml technology?
There is some information at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/XML_Todo, but
these items are mainly aiming to complete the approach taken in 8.3. As for
major new directions, this is basically up to user demand and contributing
resources.