CLogControlLock

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Paul van den Bogaard <Paul(dot)Vandenbogaard(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: CLogControlLock
Date: 2008-04-07 12:45:53
Message-ID: 8ADAEA75-9557-43FB-B30C-12FCEDC38D07@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

just started with 8.4 devel. Still focussing on LWlocks. With the
same load (#users & benchmarktool) I now see LockID 11
(CLogControlLock) to be in the top waiting list.

This one was never noticable in 8.3.

Did anything change with respect to this?

Thanks
Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
Paul van den Bogaard
Paul(dot)vandenBogaard(at)sun(dot)com
ISV-E -- ISV Engineering, Opensource Engineering group

Sun Microsystems, Inc phone: +31
334 515 918
Saturnus 1
extentsion: x (70)15918
3824 ME Amersfoort mobile: +31
651 913 354
The Netherlands
fax: +31 334 515 001


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Paul van den Bogaard <Paul(dot)Vandenbogaard(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLogControlLock
Date: 2008-04-08 03:18:04
Message-ID: 14310.1207624684@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Paul van den Bogaard <Paul(dot)Vandenbogaard(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> just started with 8.4 devel. Still focussing on LWlocks. With the
> same load (#users & benchmarktool) I now see LockID 11
> (CLogControlLock) to be in the top waiting list.

> This one was never noticable in 8.3.

> Did anything change with respect to this?

Uh, no, 8.4 devel has hardly started and I can't think of any changes
we've applied that would be likely to change the load on
CLogControlLock. What is your test case?

regards, tom lane