Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Merging recovery.conf into PostgreSQL.conf -- where did this go? |
Date: | 2014-11-19 23:09:10 |
Message-ID: | 546D2316.2000206@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hackers,
One patch that got deferred from 9.4 was the merger of recovery.conf and
postgresql.conf, due to conflicts with ALTER SYSTEM SET. However, this
is still a critical TODO, because recovery.conf is still an ongoing
major management problem for PostgreSQL DBAs.
So, what happened to this? I kinda expected it to get committed right
after we opened 9.5.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Merging recovery.conf into PostgreSQL.conf -- where did this go? |
Date: | 2014-11-19 23:13:19 |
Message-ID: | 20141119231319.GL17845@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2014-11-19 15:09:10 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> One patch that got deferred from 9.4 was the merger of recovery.conf and
> postgresql.conf, due to conflicts with ALTER SYSTEM SET. However, this
> is still a critical TODO, because recovery.conf is still an ongoing
> major management problem for PostgreSQL DBAs.
>
> So, what happened to this? I kinda expected it to get committed right
> after we opened 9.5.
Nobody did the remaining work.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From: | Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Merging recovery.conf into PostgreSQL.conf -- where did this go? |
Date: | 2014-11-20 14:26:02 |
Message-ID: | 87tx1ut0cl.fsf@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
> On 2014-11-19 15:09:10 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> One patch that got deferred from 9.4 was the merger of recovery.conf and
>> postgresql.conf, due to conflicts with ALTER SYSTEM SET. However, this
>> is still a critical TODO, because recovery.conf is still an ongoing
>> major management problem for PostgreSQL DBAs.
>>
>> So, what happened to this? I kinda expected it to get committed right
>> after we opened 9.5.
>
> Nobody did the remaining work.
I'd like to work on this. AFAICT, this CommitFest entry is the latest
on the subject, right?
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1293
Should/may I move it to the next Open fest?
--
Alex
From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Merging recovery.conf into PostgreSQL.conf -- where did this go? |
Date: | 2014-11-20 14:28:04 |
Message-ID: | 20141120142804.GC13115@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-11-20 17:26:02 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote:
>
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >
> > On 2014-11-19 15:09:10 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> One patch that got deferred from 9.4 was the merger of recovery.conf and
> >> postgresql.conf, due to conflicts with ALTER SYSTEM SET. However, this
> >> is still a critical TODO, because recovery.conf is still an ongoing
> >> major management problem for PostgreSQL DBAs.
> >>
> >> So, what happened to this? I kinda expected it to get committed right
> >> after we opened 9.5.
> >
> > Nobody did the remaining work.
>
> I'd like to work on this. AFAICT, this CommitFest entry is the latest
> on the subject, right?
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1293
>
> Should/may I move it to the next Open fest?
I think before that it needs actual work - no point in adding it to the
CF until progress has been made.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services