| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GiST rtree logic is not right |
| Date: | 2005-06-23 06:30:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A9375@rodrick.geeknet.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I'll look at problem after GiST concurrency. Fixing
> rtree_gist is bug a fix, not a new feature, so I'm not
> limited by 1 July.
Wont fixing rtree(_gist) require initdb, since the behaviour of the
operators will change?
... John
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GiST rtree logic is not right |
| Date: | 2005-06-23 14:08:26 |
| Message-ID: | 4630.1119535706@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> I'll look at problem after GiST concurrency. Fixing
>> rtree_gist is bug a fix, not a new feature, so I'm not
>> limited by 1 July.
> Wont fixing rtree(_gist) require initdb, since the behaviour of the
> operators will change?
Possibly, but we never guarantee no initdb until final release anyway.
Teodor is right that this is a bug fix and so can be postponed on its
own terms. But moving rtree_gist into the core looks like a feature
change to me, so if that's going to happen it has to happen before
1 July. It would be a lot easier to sell that if it gave the right
answers ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GiST rtree logic is not right |
| Date: | 2005-06-23 22:54:29 |
| Message-ID: | 87is04y996.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It would be a lot easier to sell that if it gave the right answers ;-)
Of course given that the real rtree index gives the wrong answers perhaps
moving rtree_gist into core (after fixing this) is just a bug fix :)
--
greg