Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-08-05 08:35:20
Message-ID: 200708050935200000@2456932136
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
> Sent: 05/08/07, 01:46:54
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
>
>
> Open up the wiki to signups with email confirmation. Give half a dozen
> people we trust access to manage users and rollback content.
>
> Call it good.

I must admit I thought we had all agreed that a while back and were discussing related issues now! :-)

Greg, can you arrange what JD has mentioned above please?

We should all keep an eye out for any spam or vandalism, and if it becomes a problem, review the signup process again.

/D


From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-08-05 18:48:58
Message-ID: 873ayxkeat.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:

>> Open up the wiki to signups with email confirmation. Give half a dozen
>> people we trust access to manage users and rollback content.
>>
>> Call it good.
>
> I must admit I thought we had all agreed that a while back and were
> discussing related issues now! :-)

One slightly more restrictive policy which might make everyone happy is to
only accept these confirmations if they correspond to emails subscribed to one
of the appropriate lists -- after all we don't want people editing pages
without being at least potentially participating in discussions about those
same pages.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com