[PATCH] fix tool list for FreeBSD

The list of tools required to build the documentation on FreeBSD is
outdated. The following patch fixes it:

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml
index 3cc1d60..9626592 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml
@@ -219,10 +219,7 @@
documentation on FreeBSD.
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
- <para><filename>textproc/sp</filename></para>
- </listitem>
- <listitem>
- <para><filename>textproc/openjade</filename></para>
+ <para><filename>textproc/jade</filename></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><filename>textproc/iso8879</filename></para>
@@ -231,7 +228,7 @@
<para><filename>textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular</filename></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
- <para><filename>textproc/docbook-420</filename></para>
+ <para><filename>textproc/docbook-sgml</filename></para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>

DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des(at)des(dot)no

On 10/16/14 3:12 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> The list of tools required to build the documentation on FreeBSD is
> outdated. The following patch fixes it:
>
> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml
> index 3cc1d60..9626592 100644
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml
> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml
> @@ -219,10 +219,7 @@
> documentation on FreeBSD.
> <itemizedlist>
> <listitem>
> - <para><filename>textproc/sp</filename></para>
> - </listitem>
> - <listitem>
> - <para><filename>textproc/openjade</filename></para>
> + <para><filename>textproc/jade</filename></para>
> </listitem>
> <listitem>
> <para><filename>textproc/iso8879</filename></para>

This replaces openjade by jade. Why? (Arguably, we should recommend
opensp if we're going to suggest openjade.)

> @@ -231,7 +228,7 @@
> <para><filename>textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular</filename></para>
> </listitem>
> <listitem>
> - <para><filename>textproc/docbook-420</filename></para>
> + <para><filename>textproc/docbook-sgml</filename></para>
> </listitem>
> </itemizedlist>
> </para>

That looks correct. We should also remove iso8879, since it's pulled in
by docbook-sgml.

And we should add docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, and libxslt.

Also, the piece about the catalog file not being updated is surely outdated?

Ironically, following the link to the FreeBSD Handbook shows the same
problem: They are linking to textproc/docbook-xml-450, which no longer
exists.

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> This replaces openjade by jade. Why? (Arguably, we should recommend
> opensp if we're going to suggest openjade.)

More or less by accident. Neither was installed when I ran configure,
so the Makefile looked for jade, not openjade. In either case, you can
remove textproc/sp; it is included in textproc/jade, while
textproc/openjade has a dependency on textproc/opensp.

> And we should add docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, and libxslt.

Do you have XML documentation? I didn't look around to much, the files
I needed to edit were SGML. I already had the XML tools, since I have
textproc/docproj installed.

> Also, the piece about the catalog file not being updated is surely
> outdated?

It worked fine, but I didn't want to remove it since I didn't know for
sure that it would work for everybody.

DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des(at)des(dot)no

On 10/20/14 3:39 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> This replaces openjade by jade. Why? (Arguably, we should recommend
>> opensp if we're going to suggest openjade.)
>
> More or less by accident. Neither was installed when I ran configure,
> so the Makefile looked for jade, not openjade. In either case, you can
> remove textproc/sp; it is included in textproc/jade, while
> textproc/openjade has a dependency on textproc/opensp.

I have updated the documentation based on your information.

>> And we should add docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, and libxslt.
>
> Do you have XML documentation? I didn't look around to much, the files
> I needed to edit were SGML. I already had the XML tools, since I have
> textproc/docproj installed.

Yes, it's used for building man pages.

>> Also, the piece about the catalog file not being updated is surely
>> outdated?
>
> It worked fine, but I didn't want to remove it since I didn't know for
> sure that it would work for everybody.

I have removed this. It was already a just-in-case at the time it was
written.