Re: No documentation on record *= record?

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: No documentation on record *= record?
Date: 2014-12-01 18:56:55
Message-ID: 547CB9F7.1020007@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

There doesn't seem to be documentation on *= (or search isn't finding it). Is this intentional?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com


From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No documentation on record *= record?
Date: 2014-12-09 14:20:21
Message-ID: 781674398.4460445.1418134821237.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10053.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> wrote:

> There doesn't seem to be documentation on *= (or search isn't
> finding it). Is this intentional?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/functions-comparisons.html#COMPOSITE-TYPE-COMPARISON

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company