| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
|---|
| From: | David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | v604 in Maven |
| Date: | 2009-05-08 18:06:48 |
| Message-ID: | 72dbd3150905081106k729aa2bfhf384f9416d07f127@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
I use Maven for a lot of my Java development and noticed that version
604 isn't in the repos, only 603. Is there a reason for that? Would
be nice to have the latest version pushed out to the central Maven
repos.
Thanks!
-Dave
| From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: v604 in Maven |
| Date: | 2009-05-14 18:46:43 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSO.4.64.0905122007460.20478@leary.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 8 May 2009, David Rees wrote:
> I use Maven for a lot of my Java development and noticed that version
> 604 isn't in the repos, only 603. Is there a reason for that? Would
> be nice to have the latest version pushed out to the central Maven
> repos.
>
I have no idea who uploaded the other versions, but it seems pretty
random. I'm not a real maven believer myself, so it's difficult to gauge
the benefit. How many other people really care about the maven repo?
Kris Jurka
| From: | David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: v604 in Maven |
| Date: | 2009-05-14 21:28:03 |
| Message-ID: | 72dbd3150905141428m592e532x749512cd0147835@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2009, David Rees wrote:
>> I use Maven for a lot of my Java development and noticed that version
>> 604 isn't in the repos, only 603. Is there a reason for that? Would
>> be nice to have the latest version pushed out to the central Maven
>> repos.
>
> I have no idea who uploaded the other versions, but it seems pretty random.
> I'm not a real maven believer myself, so it's difficult to gauge the
> benefit. How many other people really care about the maven repo?
*shrug* enough people seem to use it that every single version of
every library I use in my development is there. Of the ones that
aren't kept up to date, I've only found one, OScache - that one's a
version behind, too.
-Dave
| From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rees <drees76(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: v604 in Maven |
| Date: | 2009-05-14 23:33:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10905141633r56b185c1n842eedb241e6c9dd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Kris,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:
> I have no idea who uploaded the other versions, but it seems pretty random.
> I'm not a real maven believer myself, so it's difficult to gauge the
> benefit. How many other people really care about the maven repo?
I think we are a lot of people using Maven and PostgreSQL for our
in-house projects. And I know Open Source projects which are mavenized
and are using the "old" version of the driver too.
It would be nice to have the new version in the repository.
I think most people don't mention it because 8.3-603 is good enough
and they don't have any problem with it.
--
Guillaume