| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
|---|
| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Brant" <Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, <Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed |
| Date: | 2006-05-02 08:14:10 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35336@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> With the patch applied, I let an inhouse stress test run for
> several hours and it completed without incident. I also ran
> two runs of pgbench with 50 connections x 1000 transactions
> and one run of 50 connections x 5000 transactions. All
> completed successfully. (Test server is a dual Xeon with
> HyperThreading enabled, Windows Server 2003, PG 8.1.3).
Great news. One question though - Win 2003 with or without SP1? Wasn't
this one of the things that showed up at least more often when you had
SP1 applied?
//Magnus
| From: | "Peter Brant" <Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed |
| Date: | 2006-05-02 16:42:33 |
| Message-ID: | 445745A9020000BE00003536@gwmta.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Test server has SP1. This bug has only bit us twice (and never in a
testing environment) so it's hard to say (from our experience).
The successful pgbench runs are definitely good to see though.
Pete
>>> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> 05/02/06 10:14 am >>>
Great news. One question though - Win 2003 with or without SP1? Wasn't
this one of the things that showed up at least more often when you had
SP1 applied?