| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
|---|
| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Release, 3rd draft |
| Date: | 2005-10-03 19:53:25 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E6F5@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Whatever number is chosen, note that the MySQL people quoted 2 million
downloads of their beta (ref:
http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/news/article_959.html). Granted
they've been in beta significantly longer, and have had more beta
releases than us, but for someone comparing the press releases... Might
definitly be good to pick different wording so it can't be directly
compared.
//Magnus
> I'd try and focus more on # of beta testers, not # of
> downloads ... how many "unique visitors" have downloaded the
> beta copy? "Over 1000 beta testers ..." is more impressive,
> I think, then "20k downloads of the beta"
> ...
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > 5) I've just checked our download stats. So far, we've
> only had about
> > 11,000 beta downloads. If there's no accelleration, that
> could mean
> > about 20,000 downloads at the time of release. So,
> question, is 20,000
> > beta downloads impressive at all? Or does this make it a bad quote?
> >
> > --
> > --Josh
> >
> > Josh Berkus
> > Aglio Database Solutions
> > San Francisco
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org
> >
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy
> ICQ: 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
> so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Release, 3rd draft |
| Date: | 2005-10-03 20:11:11 |
| Message-ID: | 4341905F.8000007@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Whatever number is chosen, note that the MySQL people quoted 2 million
> downloads of their beta (ref:
> http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/news/article_959.html). Granted
> they've been in beta significantly longer, and have had more beta
> releases than us, but for someone comparing the press releases... Might
> definitly be good to pick different wording so it can't be directly
> compared.
>
> //Magnus
I would say ignore the number of beta downloads and focus on the number
of community members assisting.
A good example would be the Distributed build and testing environment
that we use (pgBuildFarm).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/