Re: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded server (not wanted) > >

Lists: pgsql-committers
From: momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded server (not wanted) > >
Date: 2006-12-15 15:40:52
Message-ID: 20061215154052.5105F9FA38F@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-committers

Log Message:
-----------
TODO item not wanted:

>
> * Embedded server (not wanted)
>
> While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the
> server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> run reliabily and efficiently. Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> to run in the same process address space as the client application
> would add too much complexity and failure cases.

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/doc:
TODO (r1.2016 -> r1.2017)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/TODO.diff?r1=1.2016&r2=1.2017)
pgsql/doc/src/FAQ:
TODO.html (r1.518 -> r1.519)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html.diff?r1=1.518&r2=1.519)


From: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded server (not wanted) > >
Date: 2006-12-16 15:35:39
Message-ID: 65937bea0612160735o307daddfh76a15b9b31915366@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 12/15/06, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> TODO item not wanted:
>
> >
> > * Embedded server (not wanted)
> >
> > While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the

I think its a typo. Should it have been:

> While PostgreSQL clients runs fine *in* limited-resource environments, the

Or 'under' !

> server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> > run reliabily and efficiently. Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> > to run in the same process address space as the client application
> > would add too much complexity and failure cases.
>
>

--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com


From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded
Date: 2006-12-17 03:57:12
Message-ID: 200612170357.kBH3vCX02982@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-committers


Thanks, fixed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > TODO item not wanted:
> >
> > >
> > > * Embedded server (not wanted)
> > >
> > > While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the
>
>
> I think its a typo. Should it have been:
>
> > While PostgreSQL clients runs fine *in* limited-resource environments, the
>
> Or 'under' !
>
> > server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> > > run reliabily and efficiently. Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> > > to run in the same process address space as the client application
> > > would add too much complexity and failure cases.
> >
> >
>
> --
> gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
> singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +