Lists: | pgsql-committers |
---|
From: | momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded server (not wanted) > > |
Date: | 2006-12-15 15:40:52 |
Message-ID: | 20061215154052.5105F9FA38F@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Log Message:
-----------
TODO item not wanted:
>
> * Embedded server (not wanted)
>
> While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the
> server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> run reliabily and efficiently. Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> to run in the same process address space as the client application
> would add too much complexity and failure cases.
Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/doc:
TODO (r1.2016 -> r1.2017)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/TODO.diff?r1=1.2016&r2=1.2017)
pgsql/doc/src/FAQ:
TODO.html (r1.518 -> r1.519)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html.diff?r1=1.518&r2=1.519)
From: | "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded server (not wanted) > > |
Date: | 2006-12-16 15:35:39 |
Message-ID: | 65937bea0612160735o307daddfh76a15b9b31915366@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 12/15/06, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> TODO item not wanted:
>
> >
> > * Embedded server (not wanted)
> >
> > While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the
I think its a typo. Should it have been:
> While PostgreSQL clients runs fine *in* limited-resource environments, the
Or 'under' !
> server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> > run reliabily and efficiently. Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> > to run in the same process address space as the client application
> > would add too much complexity and failure cases.
>
>
--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com
From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded |
Date: | 2006-12-17 03:57:12 |
Message-ID: | 200612170357.kBH3vCX02982@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Thanks, fixed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > TODO item not wanted:
> >
> > >
> > > * Embedded server (not wanted)
> > >
> > > While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the
>
>
> I think its a typo. Should it have been:
>
> > While PostgreSQL clients runs fine *in* limited-resource environments, the
>
> Or 'under' !
>
> > server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> > > run reliabily and efficiently. Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> > > to run in the same process address space as the client application
> > > would add too much complexity and failure cases.
> >
> >
>
> --
> gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
> singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +