Re: RELKIND_SPECIAL

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RELKIND_SPECIAL
Date: 2006-05-01 05:02:12
Message-ID: 20060501050211.GA2648@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

How about we remove RELKIND_SPECIAL? It was there only to support
the XactLockTable hack, but we don't need that anymore.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RELKIND_SPECIAL
Date: 2006-05-01 14:40:07
Message-ID: 5622.1146494407@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> How about we remove RELKIND_SPECIAL? It was there only to support
> the XactLockTable hack, but we don't need that anymore.

Go for it. Don't forget to remove the documentation mentions
(catalog.sgml at least). Might be a good idea to leave the code
for the case in psql/describe.c, though, just so psql doesn't choke
if run on an old database?

regards, tom lane


From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RELKIND_SPECIAL
Date: 2006-05-28 03:32:53
Message-ID: 20060528033253.GB2540@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > How about we remove RELKIND_SPECIAL? It was there only to support
> > the XactLockTable hack, but we don't need that anymore.
>
> Go for it. Don't forget to remove the documentation mentions
> (catalog.sgml at least). Might be a good idea to leave the code
> for the case in psql/describe.c, though, just so psql doesn't choke
> if run on an old database?

Done. I didn't find any other mentions in the documentation; I grepped
for "special" and "relkind".

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.