Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Possibly a comment typo in xlogrecord.h |
Date: | 2014-12-16 10:44:48 |
Message-ID: | CAH2L28v34MnU37wQQLkwtZdBdXPaW6sN6kZMJFxRNGJfgwGyZw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
The comment before declaration of XLogRecordBlockHeader says
>* 'data_length' is the length of the payload data associated with this,
> * and includes the possible full-page image, and rmgr-specific data. It
IIUC, data_length does not include associated full page image length.
Attached patch changes the comment as follows:
- * and includes the possible full-page image, and rmgr-specific data. It
- * does not include the XLogRecordBlockHeader struct itself.
+ * and includes the rmgr-specific data. It does not include the possible
+ * full page image and XLogRecordBlockHeader struct itself.
Thank you,
Rahila Syed
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
correct_comment_typo_XLogRecordBlockHeader.patch | application/octet-stream | 765 bytes |
From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Possibly a comment typo in xlogrecord.h |
Date: | 2014-12-16 13:44:22 |
Message-ID: | 54903736.7000406@vmware.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/16/2014 12:44 PM, Rahila Syed wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The comment before declaration of XLogRecordBlockHeader says
>
>> * 'data_length' is the length of the payload data associated with this,
>> * and includes the possible full-page image, and rmgr-specific data. It
>
> IIUC, data_length does not include associated full page image length.
> Attached patch changes the comment as follows:
>
> - * and includes the possible full-page image, and rmgr-specific data. It
> - * does not include the XLogRecordBlockHeader struct itself.
> + * and includes the rmgr-specific data. It does not include the possible
> + * full page image and XLogRecordBlockHeader struct itself.
Thanks, fixed! I also reworded the comment slightly, hopefully it's more
readable now.
- Heikki