Re: Incorrect comment in postgres_fdw.c

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Incorrect comment in postgres_fdw.c
Date: 2014-07-11 09:22:04
Message-ID: 53BFACBC.9000503@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I think the following comment for store_returning_result() in
postgres_fdw.c is not right.

/* PGresult must be released before leaving this function. */

I think PGresult should not be released before leaving this function *on
success* in that function.

(I guess the comment has been copied and pasted from that for
get_remote_estimate().)

Thanks,

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

Attachment Content-Type Size
postgres_fdw-comment.patch text/x-diff 436 bytes

From: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in postgres_fdw.c
Date: 2014-07-14 10:31:58
Message-ID: CAEZqfEfBpJP+kNBeOuaB-B_euBWHJR_EhXsgST5fmf1dZLLxdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujita-san,

2014-07-11 18:22 GMT+09:00 Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>:
> I think the following comment for store_returning_result() in
> postgres_fdw.c is not right.
>
> /* PGresult must be released before leaving this function. */
>
> I think PGresult should not be released before leaving this function *on
> success* in that function.
>
> (I guess the comment has been copied and pasted from that for
> get_remote_estimate().)

+1 for just removing the comment, because header comment clearly
mentions necessity of releasing the PGresult.

--
Shigeru HANADA


From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in postgres_fdw.c
Date: 2014-07-14 10:46:43
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFp3xS3YxKZw1Hr=3XGP7uaJen6mwjZJVn5c30kNt9Z9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Shigeru Hanada
<shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Fujita-san,
>
> 2014-07-11 18:22 GMT+09:00 Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>:
>> I think the following comment for store_returning_result() in
>> postgres_fdw.c is not right.
>>
>> /* PGresult must be released before leaving this function. */
>>
>> I think PGresult should not be released before leaving this function *on
>> success* in that function.
>>
>> (I guess the comment has been copied and pasted from that for
>> get_remote_estimate().)
>
> +1 for just removing the comment, because header comment clearly
> mentions necessity of releasing the PGresult.

Committed. Thanks for the report!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao


From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect comment in postgres_fdw.c
Date: 2014-07-15 02:40:09
Message-ID: 53C49489.1090000@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2014/07/14 19:46), Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Shigeru Hanada
> <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Fujita-san,
>>
>> 2014-07-11 18:22 GMT+09:00 Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>:
>>> I think the following comment for store_returning_result() in
>>> postgres_fdw.c is not right.
>>>
>>> /* PGresult must be released before leaving this function. */
>>>
>>> I think PGresult should not be released before leaving this function *on
>>> success* in that function.
>>>
>>> (I guess the comment has been copied and pasted from that for
>>> get_remote_estimate().)
>>
>> +1 for just removing the comment, because header comment clearly
>> mentions necessity of releasing the PGresult.
>
> Committed. Thanks for the report!

Thank you for committing the patch! And thanks, Hanada-san!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita