Writable Foreign Tables

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Writable Foreign Tables
Date: 2013-01-18 02:55:39
Message-ID: 50F8B9AB.9020900@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Committers,

The writable foreign tables patch is flagged ready for committer. While
its last activity was in late 2012, I haven't noticed much else changing
in the area that'd be likely to break it, and FDWs are a somewhat
immature feature anyway. It's been revised based on initial reviews.

Is anyone willing to commit this or do you want further testing?

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=919

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Writable Foreign Tables
Date: 2013-01-18 03:10:21
Message-ID: 23984.1358478621@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The writable foreign tables patch is flagged ready for committer. While
> its last activity was in late 2012, I haven't noticed much else changing
> in the area that'd be likely to break it, and FDWs are a somewhat
> immature feature anyway. It's been revised based on initial reviews.

> Is anyone willing to commit this or do you want further testing?

I think that one is probably my responsibility, along with the
postgresql FDW which is in the same general turf. My plan is to try to
commit whatever seems immediately commitable over the next few days, and
then sit down and take a hard look at those patches to see if they're
really ready to go in or not.

regards, tom lane