| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Extension ownership and pg_dump |
| Date: | 2011-07-14 15:51:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4E1F1072.3010300@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
pg_dump seems to not dump the owner of extensions. Is that intentional?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extension ownership and pg_dump |
| Date: | 2011-07-14 19:05:30 |
| Message-ID: | 7272.1310670330@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> pg_dump seems to not dump the owner of extensions. Is that intentional?
Yeah. Partly it was a matter of not wanting to implement ALTER
EXTENSION OWNER, but I think there were some definitional issues too.
See the archives from back around February or so.
regards, tom lane